Spokesman Briefings
Date: 12/12/2007
Record of Press Briefing on 12 December, 2007
Opening Statement
Mr.
Wang Yi, Senior Vice Foreign Minister of China is visiting
Pakistan from 11-13 December 2007 as Special Envoy of the
Chinese Government. The visit is part of the high level
exchanges that are a unique characteristic of Pak-China
relations. Such visits provide dynamism and strength to our
bilateral relationship. The visit of Mr. Wang Yi has provided
an opportunity to the two sides to reaffirm their time tested
ties of friendship and strategic partnership.
Mr. Wang Yi held in depth discussions with Foreign
Minister Mr. Inam ul Haque and Foreign Secretary Mr. Riaz
Mohammad Khan. Both sides expressed complete satisfaction over
the state of close bilateral relations. Based on the popular
ethos of the people, these ties of abiding friendship have
withstood changes in regional and global environment.
They
reviewed, at length, the on-going cooperation between Pakistan
and China in diverse fields and resolved to further strengthen
their cooperative partnership in defence, economic,
commercial, cultural, educational, scientific and technical
fields. Government of Pakistan’s gratitude was conveyed for
the support and assistance being extended by China for several
projects of national significance.
Mr.
Wang Yi, on behalf of Chinese President Hu Jintao, conveyed
China’s strong support for policies being pursued under
President Musharraf’s leadership. He added that China had
always supported Pakistan and would wish to see a vibrant,
peaceful and stable Pakistan.
The visiting Senior Vice Foreign Minister also called
on the Minister for Interior. They exchanged Instruments of
Ratification of the Extradition Treaty which was signed in
November 2003 during President Musharraf’s visit to China.
The Chinese Vice Foreign Minister, accompanied by the
Foreign Secretary, is visiting Northern Areas today where
China has undertaken a number of projects.
Mr. Wang Yi will call on the President and the Prime
Minister on 13 December.
Question/Answer
Session
Q: Did the visiting Chinese dignitary show any concern
about the imposition of emergency in Pakistan?
A: No, the Vice Foreign Minister did not express any such
concern. However, Pakistan side did brief him on the political
developments.
Q: Did Pakistan take up the issue of BLA as a terrorist
organization recently with the British Government?
A: I understand BLA had already been declared a terrorist
organization some time back.
Q: Do you have any information about the background of
arrest of BLA activists in UK?
A: We are aware of their arrest but the Spokesman of the
Interior Ministry will be in a better position to respond to
this question.
Q: Two years earlier we saw the Pakistani Foreign Minister
shake hands with the Israeli Foreign Minister and now Pakistan
voted for the UN resolution introduced by Israel which has
been boycotted by the Arab countries. Does this denote
something new?
A: The resolution you are talking about, I think, is the
one which was adapted yesterday by the UN. It was a technical
resolution, which had no political agenda. It is entitled
“Agricultural Technology for Development”. 118 countries
voted in favor of it with 29 abstentions.
No country voted against it. 74 countries co-sponsored
it; Israel was not alone in moving it.
A
number of OIC countries, including Turkey, Albania,
Azerbaijan, Bosnia, Bangladesh and Senegal, either
co-sponsored this resolution or supported it. The resolution
deals with transfer of agricultural technology and know-how to
developing countries with an aim to eradicate poverty. The
voting on the resolution has no impact on Pakistan’s policy
towards Israel. We have been sitting in, or chairing, meetings
in the UN where Israel was also a member. Supporting a
resolution co-sponsored by a country like Israel which is not
recognized by Pakistan does not mean our policy has changed.
Our vote for the resolution should be seen in its right
context. Let me tell you that no member country voted against
the resolution.
Q: Update us on the progress of IPI? What is the stance of
the Indian Government on it?
A:
Technical talks were held in Islamabad on 5-8 December
followed by the meeting of the Working Group meeting which
ended just yesterday. It was a 2 day session where a number of
issues were discussed and a lot of ground covered. The two
sides will be meeting again on 17 December in Tehran. India is
not a part of the dialogue at this stage but we hope that it
will join the process at a latter stage.
Q: Give us information about the Foreign Minister’s
statement in Delhi where he mentioned that Manmohan Singh will
visit Pakistan next year and the issue of Wullar Barrage and
Siachin are ready for signing? Also with regard to the
extradition treaty with China, are there any Pakistani
prisoners in China, or any Chinese nationals in Pakistani
prisons, who are required by either country?
A: The Foreign Minister’s statement in India was
misreported. Foreign Minister Inam-ul-Haque did not mention
any time frame for the Indian Prime Minister’s visit.
Similarly, negotiations are going on the issues you mentioned
and Pakistan is hopeful that we will reach a resolution of
these issues.
I
am not aware of any Chinese in Pakistani prisons who are
wanted by China or any Pakistanis in Chinese prison who are
specifically wanted by us. However, there are some Pakistanis
in Chinese prisons and our Embassy is providing them consular
access.
Q: Why the need for this treaty with a friendly country? Is there any particular reason for signing it?
A: We have Extradition Treaty with other friendly
countries too, now we have signed it with China also. There is
no particular reason for signing it at this time.
Q: Have you received any requests from foreign observers
regarding the upcoming elections?
A: We did. We have already issued some two dozen visas and
are working on others. Hopefully, by next week we will be able
to tell you who is coming and from which countries and
organizations.
Q: Yesterday at the eve of testing of cruise missile a
strong statement was made that Pakistan’s nuclear assets are
safe. Does Pakistan perceive any threat from any country
concerning that? Is there any specific reason as to why such a
strong statement was made after the testing this time?
A: Since last 3 weeks we have been discussing this issue
from this podium. A number of articles had appeared in the
international media insinuating that the assets aren’t safe
and their control should be taken over. Our basic reaction in
this room, which was reported all over the world, was that the
strategic assets are safe under a strong control and command
system and elaborate layers of security. No country in the
world has told us that our assets are not safe. In fact,
foreign governments are on record stating that our assets are
safe and there is no risk of their falling in wrong hands.
Since there were media reports it was considered appropriate
to remind the world, and take our media in confidence, that
our assets were completely safe and there was no danger of
their falling in wrong hands.
Q: You said the Chinese Vice Foreign Minister is visiting
Northern Areas where there are many Chinese aided projects.
Can you identify one? Also there are speculative reports that
the Chinese will sign an agreement for 4-5 nuclear power
plants during this visit. Can you tell us about that?
A: Chinese companies are working on a number of projects.
Karakoram Highway is one such project whose reconstruction was
also aided by the Chinese.
I
am not aware if the nuclear cooperation is part of the agenda
of this visit.
Q: There was a time in Pakistan when our Heads of State
said that Islamic ideology formed the basis of our foreign
policy but gradually we have seen the secularization of our
foreign policy with Pakistan slowly and quietly inching
towards recognition of Israel. Similarly, Pakistani
territories are under Indian occupation and we are quiet on
that. We call the Composite Dialogue an important process
while our territories remain under Indian occupation with the
result that Indian military power is growing by leaps and
bounds. What are your comments?
A: Regarding Israel I just said that there is no change in
our policy so I am surprised that you asked that question
again. Being on the same side of the resolution does not mean
we are recognizing Israel. I will remind you that for a
decade, Israel voted for the resolutions asking for withdrawal
of Soviet troops which was co-sponsored by Pakistan. Nobody
raised the question that we were inching closer to recognition
of Israel. There are probably a thousand examples where
Pakistan and Israel voted on the same side or sat in meetings
where Israel is a member and we chaired the meetings and they
called us “Mr. or Madam Chair” and we responded. There is
nothing substantially different in our support for a
resolution co-sponsored by
78 States on transfer of agriculture technology and know-how
to developing countries to eradicate poverty. Pakistan’s
position on Israel remained what it was before and that policy
continues because it represents sentiments of the people of
Pakistan.
Regarding
India, What you are suggesting is that we are leaving occupied
territories under the control of India. We are not doing that.
We are negotiating the dispute. There is nothing wrong in
negotiations. Our principled position remains based on the UN
resolutions on Kashmir. So there is no change in our policy
either towards Israel or India.
Q: Some of the important decision makers of Pakistan’s
nuclear hierarchy were part of the meetings with the Chinese
Vice Foreign Minister yesterday. Our camera covered the
initial glimpses of the meeting. Is the visit related to the
Pakistan-China nuclear cooperation? What are the details of
the extradition treaty which was to be signed between Pakistan
and UK by which Murri has been arrested by British police and
Rashid Rauf was to be sent to UK?
A: Pakistan China cooperation for peaceful use of nuclear
energy has been going on for a long time and that will
continue. I am not aware we are discussing nuclear cooperation
with Senior Vice Foreign Minister Mr. Wang Yi. The meetings I
know about have not discussed this issue.
The Baloch nationalists arrested in UK were not
arrested because of any Extradition Treaty. We do not have an
Extradition Treaty with UK.
|